An Official Partner of AFC Bournemouth
5 : 0
  • 02 September 2026, Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic, 1-2, Lose
  • 30 August 2026, Las Vegas Lights FC vs Charleston Battery, 0-2, Win
  • 24 August 2026, Charleston Battery vs Miami FC, 5-0, Win
  • 15 August 2026, Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Charleston Battery, 3-1, Lose
  • 08 August 2026, Loudoun United FC vs Charleston Battery, 0-1, Win
Charleston Battery
Home
  • 05 September 2026, Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Brooklyn FC, 2-0, Lose
  • 29 August 2026, Brooklyn FC vs Sporting JAX, 4-1, Win
  • 22 August 2026, Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds, 0-1, Lose
  • 16 August 2026, Las Vegas Lights FC vs Brooklyn FC, 2-1, Lose
  • 01 August 2026, Charleston Battery vs Brooklyn FC, 5-0, Lose
Brooklyn FC
Away
USL Championship
USL Championship, USA

Charleston Battery ran out 5-0 winners over Brooklyn FC, with a rapid opener at 1:04 and a second before the break that left Brooklyn facing a tall order. The late burst in the second half extended the lead to 5-0, culminating at 89:48. The result underlines a dominant home display from the outset and a capitulation from Brooklyn after the interval.

Charleston demonstrated clear attacking intent from the start, puncturing Brooklyn inside the first two minutes. The 2-0 lead by 43:37 kept the floodgates open, and the subsequent three goals in quick succession after the break signal a sustained, high-pressing approach and efficient finishing. Brooklyn’s numbers suggest they struggled to repel the quick transitions Charleston employed after winning the ball high.

Teamwork and performance reflect a stark contrast: Charleston’s cohesion allowed repeated pressure and goal-conversion, while Brooklyn12 fouls out of line with three yellow cards for Charleston and two for Brooklyn, yet the home side still managed to keep Brooklyn at bay. Brooklyn’s discipline issues—11 fouls and a couple of bookings—correlated with losing grip on the tempo after the opening advantage.

Set-piece activity shows Brooklyn had more corner opportunities (6) than Charleston (3), but the extra corners did not translate into danger or a goal return. Offside count was minimal, with Charleston 1 and Brooklyn 0, indicating both sides were largely well-organized in their attacking runs. The yellow cards (3 for Charleston, 2 for Brooklyn) did not deter Charleston from maintaining pressure through the second half.

Defensively, Charleston’s backline and midfield pivot kept Brooklyn from mounting any consolation strikes, yielding a clean sheet in the 5-0 rout. Brooklyn’s defensive organization appeared unable to cope with the tempo and verticality of Charleston’s breaks, especially once Charleston moved 2-0 ahead. The red cards, one for each side, did not prevent Charleston from extending the lead, suggesting Brooklyn’s opportunity to mount a comeback was extinguished early in the second period.

Tactically, the match read as a high-press, quick-transition duel, with Charleston exploiting space behind Brooklyn’s line on two distinct phases: an early game plan to strike quickly and a second-half surge that capitalised on unsettled defensive shapes. The timing of the third and fourth goals (53:30 and 56:53) indicates Charleston maintained intensity immediately after halftime, preventing Brooklyn from stabilizing. Brooklyn’s approach, while combative, lacked the immediate counter-pressure required to disrupt Charleston’s rhythm.

The most significant factors influencing the outcome were Charleston’s early goal and their sustained attacking intensity, which kept Brooklyn under constant pressure. The 5-0 scoreline also reflects Brooklyn’s inability to convert their higher ball-in-play opportunities with any meaningful return. Red cards for both sides did not alter the pattern, but Brooklyn’s higher foul count hints at a concession to Charleston’s momentum.

From a betting perspective, the match supported an aggressive home-win thesis and over-like scoring dynamics, given the five goals and rapid scoring sequence. Brooklyn’s higher corner count failed to translate into a threat or consolation, underscoring the futility of set-piece volume without clinical finishing. Overall, Charleston’s tactical tempo and clinical finishing proved decisive, while Brooklyn’s discipline and defensive structure lagged after the initial blow.

BET NOW

Form Guide

Lose1-2Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic
Win0-2Las Vegas Lights FC vs Charleston Battery
Win5-0Charleston Battery vs Miami FC
Lose3-1Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Charleston Battery
Win0-1Loudoun United FC vs Charleston Battery
PLAYED
5
WINS
3
GOALS
10:5
GOALS / MATCH
2
  • Charleston Battery has won three out of its last five matches with a goal difference of 10:5, scoring 2 goals average
Lose2-0Tampa Bay Rowdies vs Brooklyn FC
Win4-1Brooklyn FC vs Sporting JAX
Lose0-1Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Lose2-1Las Vegas Lights FC vs Brooklyn FC
Lose5-0Charleston Battery vs Brooklyn FC
PLAYED
5
WINS
1
GOALS
5:11
GOALS / MATCH
1
  • Brooklyn FC has won only one out of its last five matches with a goal difference of 5:11, scoring 1 goals average

Charleston Battery H2H Brooklyn FC

Home gameCharleston Battery50Brooklyn FCAway gameUSL Championship
Away gameCharleston Battery03Brooklyn FCHome gameUSL Championship
PLAYED
2
WINS
1
GOALS
5:3
GOALS / MATCH
2.50
  • In the last two matches that these two sides meet, Charleston Battery overtook Brooklyn FC once
  • Charleston Battery won once, lost once
  • Teams played two times head-to-head in the current season with the goals score 5:3; average goals per match – 2.50
BET NOW

FAQ

Football today takes a brief interlude, presenting a perfect moment to hone your betting prowess. Our tipsters have crafted insightful betting tips for the upcoming games. With the added advantage of copy bets, mimic the strategies of successful bettors to enhance your winning potential. Embrace the expertise of our tipsters and transform your next bet into a victory, eagerly awaiting the return of the beautiful game with optimism.

Explore our sportsbook today!