- 30 May 2026, Orlando Pride (Wom) vs Bay FC (Wom), 3-1, Lose
- 24 May 2026, Bay FC (Wom) vs Chicago Red Stars (Wom), 0-1, Lose
- 21 May 2026, Portland Thorns (Wom) vs Bay FC (Wom), 2-0, Lose
- 16 May 2026, Bay FC (Wom) vs Boston Legacy FC (Wom), 1-1, Draw
- 10 May 2026, Bay FC (Wom) vs Utah Royals FC (Wom), 0-0, Draw
- 31 May 2026, Chicago Red Stars (Wom) vs San Diego Wave FC (Wom), 0-2, Lose
- 24 May 2026, Bay FC (Wom) vs Chicago Red Stars (Wom), 0-1, Win
- 16 May 2026, North Carolina Courage (Wom) vs Chicago Red Stars (Wom), 4-0, Lose
- 10 May 2026, Kansas City Current (Wom) vs Chicago Red Stars (Wom), 3-0, Lose
- 03 May 2026, Chicago Red Stars (Wom) vs Portland Thorns (Wom), 0-2, Lose
Chicago Red Stars secured a 1-0 away win over Bay FC (Wom), with the decisive moment arriving in the second half. Bay FC faced a dramatic disruption as they were reduced to ten men by two red cards, while Chicago maintained discipline with no red cards on the night. Bay’s advantage in corners (5 to 1) and frequent offside calls (6 for Bay, 0 for Chicago) signal an aggressive imbalance in approach that did not translate into goals.
The goal fell in the second half at 01:10:10, after Bay had pressed for a breakthrough but were hampered by the numerical disadvantage. Chicago capitalized on the space and kept their defensive shape intact to deny Bay an equalizer. This sequence underscores Chicago’s ability to absorb pressure and convert a late opportunity into a winning goal.
Bay FC’s six offside calls reveal repeated forward incursions that were deemed offside, despite a five-corner advantage that suggests persistent attacking intent. Chicago’s defense remained compact and organized through these waves, limiting clear-cut finishing chances despite Bay’s sustained pressure. The contrast highlights how aggressive runs without clinical execution can be punished when an opponent remains disciplined at the back.
Set-piece dynamics show Bay created five corners but could not convert, indicating a gap between pressure and finishing quality. Chicago’s box organization and likely goalkeeping support absorbed the set-piece volume without conceding, contributing to their clean sheet despite Bay’s attacking numbers. In this regard, set-piece advantage did not yield a decisive goal for Bay.
Discipline and teamwork factor strongly in this match: Bay FC’s two red cards disrupted their game plan and likely shifted their shape to a more conservative stance. Chicago’s three yellow cards and clean execution of their defensive plan suggest effective collective work and tactical discipline. The result points to Chicago’s ability to maintain structure and exploit key moments even when Bay pressed with high intensity.
Substitutions data are not provided in the dataset, so their impact cannot be assessed here. From the available information, the critical factor appears to be Bay FC’s inability to convert pressure into goals despite a favorable corner count and aggressive forward play, compounded by two red cards, which ultimately allowed Chicago to secure the win through a disciplined, opportunistic countering moment.
Form Guide
| Lose | 3-1 | Orlando Pride (Wom) vs Bay FC (Wom) | |
| Lose | 0-1 | Bay FC (Wom) vs Chicago Red Stars (Wom) | |
| Lose | 2-0 | Portland Thorns (Wom) vs Bay FC (Wom) | |
| Draw | 1-1 | Bay FC (Wom) vs Boston Legacy FC (Wom) | |
| Draw | 0-0 | Bay FC (Wom) vs Utah Royals FC (Wom) |
- PLAYED
- 5
- WINS
- 0
- GOALS
- 2:7
- GOALS / MATCH
- 0.4
- Bay FC (Wom) has lost three matches in a row with a goal difference of 2:7, scoring 0.4 goals average
| Lose | 0-2 | Chicago Red Stars (Wom) vs San Diego Wave FC (Wom) | |
| Win | 0-1 | Bay FC (Wom) vs Chicago Red Stars (Wom) | |
| Lose | 4-0 | North Carolina Courage (Wom) vs Chicago Red Stars (Wom) | |
| Lose | 3-0 | Kansas City Current (Wom) vs Chicago Red Stars (Wom) | |
| Lose | 0-2 | Chicago Red Stars (Wom) vs Portland Thorns (Wom) |
- PLAYED
- 5
- WINS
- 1
- GOALS
- 1:11
- GOALS / MATCH
- 0.2
- Chicago Red Stars (Wom) has won only one out of its last five matches with a goal difference of 1:11, scoring 0.2 goals average
Bay FC (Wom) H2H Chicago Red Stars (Wom)
| Home game | Bay FC (Wom) | 0 | 1 | Chicago Red Stars (Wom) | Away game | NWSL - Women | |
| Away game | Bay FC (Wom) | 1 | 1 | Chicago Red Stars (Wom) | Home game | NWSL - Women | |
| Home game | Bay FC (Wom) | 1 | 2 | Chicago Red Stars (Wom) | Away game | NWSL - Women | |
| Away game | Bay FC (Wom) | 2 | 1 | Chicago Red Stars (Wom) | Home game | NWSL - Women | |
| Home game | Bay FC (Wom) | 1 | 2 | Chicago Red Stars (Wom) | Away game | NWSL - Women |
- PLAYED
- 5
- WINS
- 1
- GOALS
- 5:7
- GOALS / MATCH
- 1.00
- Bay FC (Wom) lost three times in head-to-head matches
- Teams played five times head-to-head in the current season with the goals score 5:7; average goals per match – 1.00
FAQ
Are any of the tips provided here guaranteed?
What are the eligibility requirements to sign up and bet online with CopyBet™?
Football today takes a brief interlude, presenting a perfect moment to hone your betting prowess. Our tipsters have crafted insightful betting tips for the upcoming games. With the added advantage of copy bets, mimic the strategies of successful bettors to enhance your winning potential. Embrace the expertise of our tipsters and transform your next bet into a victory, eagerly awaiting the return of the beautiful game with optimism.
Explore our sportsbook today!