An Official Partner of AFC Bournemouth
3 : 1
  • 04 September 2026, New York City FC vs Nashville SC, 0-0, Draw
  • 29 August 2026, Toronto FC vs New York City FC, 1-1, Draw
  • 23 August 2026, New England Revolution vs New York City FC, 1-1, Draw
  • 19 August 2026, FC Cincinnati vs New York City FC, 2-1, Lose
  • 16 August 2026, New York City FC vs Philadelphia Union, 2-3, Lose
New York City FC
Home
  • 05 September 2026, Toronto FC vs Chicago Fire, 4-4, Draw
  • 29 August 2026, Seattle Sounders vs Chicago Fire, 2-2, Draw
  • 22 August 2026, New York Red Bulls vs Chicago Fire, 1-1, Draw
  • 19 August 2026, Orlando City SC vs Chicago Fire, 1-2, Win
  • 16 August 2026, Chicago Fire vs Portland Timbers, 2-1, Win
Chicago Fire
Away
MLS
MLS, USA

New York City FC defeated Chicago Fire 3-1. The home side struck first at 10:04, Chicago levelled at 20:40, and NYCFC pulled ahead again with finishes at 28:55 and 40:14 to take a 3-1 lead into half-time.

NYCFC’s opener and the subsequent quick second-half sequence illustrate clear attacking intent and efficient finishing in the first half. Chicago’s equaliser showed they could respond swiftly, but NYCFC immediately reasserted control with two more quick strikes. The 5-2 difference in offside calls (NYCFC 5, Chicago 2) points to more aggressive forward runs from NYCFC and a higher risk of being flagged for offside.

Defensively, NYCFC committed 16 fouls compared with Chicago’s 8, indicating a more combative approach to disrupting Chicago’s build-up. Chicago collected three yellow cards to NYCFC’s one, yet there were no red cards, suggesting disciplined enforcement by the hosts despite the physicality. The foul distribution implies NYCFC defended with intensity, while Chicago navigated more frequent stoppages.

Set-piece activity shows Chicago earned two corners to NYCFC’s one, but those opportunities did not translate into goals for the visitors. The three NYCFC goals were produced through open-play phases rather than direct set-piece finishes. This hints at superior consistency in breaking lines and finishing during open-play attacks.

Teamwork and tactical insight reveal NYCFC’s attacking shape was versatile, with goals coming from multiple attacking outlets rather than a single focal point. Chicago’s structure absorbed early pressure after the opening goal but failed to sustain a defensive response against NYCFC’s front-foot pressure before the break. Overall, NYCFC’s first-half performance was decisive, converting their chances while managing Chicago’s counter-pushes more effectively.

The most significant factor in the outcome was NYCFC’s finishing efficiency in the first 45 minutes, converting four goal chances into three goals. The higher foul count by NYCFC signals a willingness to employ physical pressure to disrupt Chicago’s rhythm, while Chicago’s three yellows indicate they fought to stay competitive but could not match NYCFC’s timely attacking execution. Substitution data is not provided, so its impact cannot be assessed within this coverage.

BET NOW

Form Guide

Draw0-0New York City FC vs Nashville SC
Draw1-1Toronto FC vs New York City FC
Draw1-1New England Revolution vs New York City FC
Lose2-1FC Cincinnati vs New York City FC
Lose2-3New York City FC vs Philadelphia Union
PLAYED
5
WINS
0
GOALS
5:7
GOALS / MATCH
1
  • New York City FC has lost two matches in a row with a goal difference of 5:7, scoring 1 goals average
Draw4-4Toronto FC vs Chicago Fire
Draw2-2Seattle Sounders vs Chicago Fire
Draw1-1New York Red Bulls vs Chicago Fire
Win1-2Orlando City SC vs Chicago Fire
Win2-1Chicago Fire vs Portland Timbers
PLAYED
5
WINS
2
GOALS
11:9
GOALS / MATCH
2.2
  • Chicago Fire has two wins in its last five matches with a goal difference of 11:9, scoring 2.2 goals average

New York City FC H2H Chicago Fire

Home gameNew York City FC31Chicago FireAway gameMLS
Away gameNew York City FC31Chicago FireHome gameMLS
Home gameNew York City FC31Chicago FireAway gameMLS
Home gameNew York City FC22Chicago FireAway gameMLS
Away gameNew York City FC00Chicago FireHome gameMLS
PLAYED
5
WINS
3
GOALS
11:5
GOALS / MATCH
2.20
  • In the last five matches that these two sides meet, New York City FC overtook Chicago Fire three times
  • New York City FC won three times and had two draw
  • Teams played five times head-to-head in the current season with the goals score 11:5; average goals per match – 2.20
BET NOW

FAQ

Football today takes a brief interlude, presenting a perfect moment to hone your betting prowess. Our tipsters have crafted insightful betting tips for the upcoming games. With the added advantage of copy bets, mimic the strategies of successful bettors to enhance your winning potential. Embrace the expertise of our tipsters and transform your next bet into a victory, eagerly awaiting the return of the beautiful game with optimism.

Explore our sportsbook today!