An Official Partner of AFC Bournemouth
1 : 0
  • 20 September 2026, IFK Norrkoping DFK (Wom) vs FC Rosengard (Wom), 2-1, Lose
  • 12 September 2026, FC Rosengard (Wom) vs IK Uppsala (Wom), 1-0, Win
  • 05 September 2026, Djurgardens IF (Wom) vs FC Rosengard (Wom), 0-1, Win
  • 29 August 2026, FC Rosengard (Wom) vs BK Hacken (Wom), 0-1, Lose
  • 22 August 2026, Kristianstads DFF (Wom) vs FC Rosengard (Wom), 1-1, Draw
FC Rosengard (Wom)
Home
  • 19 September 2026, IK Uppsala (Wom) vs IF Brommapojkarna (Wom), 0-1, Lose
  • 12 September 2026, FC Rosengard (Wom) vs IK Uppsala (Wom), 1-0, Lose
  • 05 September 2026, Vittsjo GIK (Wom) vs IK Uppsala (Wom), 5-0, Lose
  • 28 August 2026, IK Uppsala (Wom) vs Eskilstuna United DFF (Wom), 0-6, Lose
  • 23 August 2026, Pitea IF (Wom) vs IK Uppsala (Wom), 5-1, Lose
IK Uppsala (Wom)
Away
Damallsvenskan
Damallsvenskan, Sweden

FC Rosengard (Wom) edged IK Uppsala (Wom) 1-0 in a tightly contested Damallsvenskan clash. The decisive moment came in the second half when Rosengard found the net to secure the win. Both teams finished with zero bookings, underscoring a disciplined, low-friction contest.

Rosengard's second-half goal suggests a tactical adjustment that increased pressure in the final third. Without full data on assists or shot counts, we cannot identify the exact sequence, but the finish confirms effective conversion after halftime.

Defensively, Rosengard preserved a clean sheet by keeping Uppsala at bay for the full 90 minutes. The away side created limited clear-cut opportunities, pointing to an organized defensive shape and disciplined pressing.

No cards for either side imply controlled challenges and minimal interruptions from fouls. Data on corners or set-pieces is not provided, so we cannot quantify any numerical advantage from dead-ball situations.

Teamwork on the home side was defined by compactness and a purposeful second-half push. Uppsala's collective performance showed resilience but lacked a cutting edge to breach Rosengard's defense.

Tactical insight suggests Rosengard prioritized structural stability at the back while hunting for an opening after halftime. The absence of goals for Uppsala implies they were unable to unlock the hosts’ shape, despite opportunities to press for a draw.

From a betting perspective, the match delivered a 1-0 final, which falls under 2.5 goals and confirms Rosengard's clean-sheet win at home. Without information on xG, shot quality, or assists, this outcome reinforces the value of cautious, defensively oriented plays in similar home fixtures.

Key factors with the most impact were the second-half breakthrough and the ability to maintain a clean sheet. Rosengard's late conversion and staunch rearguard work disrupted Uppsala's plans.

BET NOW

Form Guide

Lose2-1IFK Norrkoping DFK (Wom) vs FC Rosengard (Wom)
Win1-0FC Rosengard (Wom) vs IK Uppsala (Wom)
Win0-1Djurgardens IF (Wom) vs FC Rosengard (Wom)
Lose0-1FC Rosengard (Wom) vs BK Hacken (Wom)
Draw1-1Kristianstads DFF (Wom) vs FC Rosengard (Wom)
PLAYED
5
WINS
2
GOALS
4:4
GOALS / MATCH
0.8
  • FC Rosengard (Wom) has two wins in its last five matches with a goal difference of 4:4, scoring 0.8 goals average
Lose0-1IK Uppsala (Wom) vs IF Brommapojkarna (Wom)
Lose1-0FC Rosengard (Wom) vs IK Uppsala (Wom)
Lose5-0Vittsjo GIK (Wom) vs IK Uppsala (Wom)
Lose0-6IK Uppsala (Wom) vs Eskilstuna United DFF (Wom)
Lose5-1Pitea IF (Wom) vs IK Uppsala (Wom)
PLAYED
5
WINS
0
GOALS
1:18
GOALS / MATCH
0.2
  • IK Uppsala (Wom) has lost five matches in a row with a goal difference of 1:18, scoring 0.2 goals average

FC Rosengard (Wom) H2H IK Uppsala (Wom)

Home gameFC Rosengard (Wom)10IK Uppsala (Wom)Away gameDamallsvenskan
Away gameFC Rosengard (Wom)11IK Uppsala (Wom)Home gameDamallsvenskan
Home gameFC Rosengard (Wom)52IK Uppsala (Wom)Away gameDamallsvenskan
Away gameFC Rosengard (Wom)00IK Uppsala (Wom)Home gameDamallsvenskan
Home gameFC Rosengard (Wom)51IK Uppsala (Wom)Away gameDamallsvenskan
PLAYED
5
WINS
3
GOALS
12:4
GOALS / MATCH
2.40
  • In the last five matches that these two sides meet, FC Rosengard (Wom) overtook IK Uppsala (Wom) three times
  • FC Rosengard (Wom) won three times and had two draw
  • Teams played five times head-to-head in the current season with the goals score 12:4; average goals per match – 2.40
BET NOW

FAQ

Football today takes a brief interlude, presenting a perfect moment to hone your betting prowess. Our tipsters have crafted insightful betting tips for the upcoming games. With the added advantage of copy bets, mimic the strategies of successful bettors to enhance your winning potential. Embrace the expertise of our tipsters and transform your next bet into a victory, eagerly awaiting the return of the beautiful game with optimism.

Explore our sportsbook today!