0 : 1
  • 31 May 2026, Ansan Greeners FC vs Cheonan City FC, 1-3, Lose
  • 24 May 2026, Daegu FC vs Ansan Greeners FC, 3-0, Lose
  • 16 May 2026, Ansan Greeners FC vs Gimpo FC, 0-1, Lose
  • 10 May 2026, Ansan Greeners FC vs Yongin City FC, 1-2, Lose
  • 03 May 2026, Hwaseong FC vs Ansan Greeners FC, 2-0, Lose
Ansan Greeners FC
Home
  • 30 May 2026, Gimhae FC vs Gimpo FC, 1-2, Win
  • 25 May 2026, Paju Citizen FC vs Gimpo FC, 0-1, Win
  • 16 May 2026, Ansan Greeners FC vs Gimpo FC, 0-1, Win
  • 09 May 2026, Chungbuk Cheongju FC vs Gimpo FC, 1-1, Draw
  • 03 May 2026, Seoul E-Land FC vs Gimpo FC, 2-1, Lose
Gimpo FC
Away
K League 2
K League 2, Korea (South)

Gimpo FC claimed a 1-0 victory away to Ansan Greeners FC, with the decisive strike arriving inside the opening four minutes of the first half. Despite being reduced to ten men later in the match, Gimpo held firm to protect the lead. Ansan generated more corner opportunities (6) than Gimpo (2), but were unable to convert them into an equalising goal.

Ansan committed 18 fouls, significantly more than Gimpo’s 7, indicating a more aggressive approach that disrupted their rhythm. Only one yellow card for each side was shown, with Gimpo’s booking arriving in the first half and Ansan’s in the second. There were 2 offside calls for Ansan versus none for Gimpo, reflecting a more forward-leaning but perhaps over-ambitious approach from the home side.

Defensive performance under pressure was a defining factor, as Gimpo managed to maintain a clean sheet after going down to ten men. Ansan’s set-piece volume did not translate into meaningful goal threats, despite driving more corners and pressure in the final third. Without available data on saves or shots on target, we cannot quantify goalkeeper influence, but the result implies effective Gimpo organization at the back.

Set-piece dynamics show a clear home advantage in corner count for Ansan; it did not convert into goals, suggesting inefficiencies in finishing or cross quality. Gimpo’s defense remained compact during the reduced-man phase, denying the hosts clear opportunities from deliveries. The absence of data on assists or shot quality limits deeper assessment of how wide plays fed the lone goal.

Attacking intent and tactical insight point to Gimpo absorbing pressure after the opening goal and relying on structured defense to preserve the lead. Ansan attempted to increase depth with off-ball runs, but the combination of high fouling and extended pressing did not yield a breakthrough. The single-goal margin underscores the impact of that early opener and subsequent defensive resilience.

Teamwork and performance comparison indicate Gimpo’s cohesion shone through during the numerically inferior phase, while Ansan’s collective pressing failed to create a decisive moment. Gimpo’s discipline under a 10-man scenario supports the value of defensive compactness and controlled transitions on the road. Ansan’s willingness to push for a tie via corners and wide service may require better finishing or cross accuracy to turn dominance into goals.

Most significant match factors were the early opening by Gimpo and the red card which forced Ansan to chase the game with numerically fewer players. That combination, rather than overall shot volume (not provided), appears to have shaped the outcome in a low-scoring, strategic contest. The red card did not compromise Gimpo’s capacity to defend their lead, highlighting the importance of game management after a moment of numerical disadvantage.

Betting takeaway: the result reinforces the potential value of under 2.5 goals in such scenarios and shows how a leading team can survive with ten men against a side running higher foul counts. For future bets, monitor teams that can absorb pressure and maintain shape after reduced numbers, as this tends to be a stronger predictor than corner volume alone. Finally, the lack of data on shots on target or saves means the analysis focuses on discipline, corners, and set-piece development as primary signals.

BET NOW

Form Guide

Lose1-3Ansan Greeners FC vs Cheonan City FC
Lose3-0Daegu FC vs Ansan Greeners FC
Lose0-1Ansan Greeners FC vs Gimpo FC
Lose1-2Ansan Greeners FC vs Yongin City FC
Lose2-0Hwaseong FC vs Ansan Greeners FC
PLAYED
5
WINS
0
GOALS
2:11
GOALS / MATCH
0.4
  • Ansan Greeners FC has lost five matches in a row with a goal difference of 2:11, scoring 0.4 goals average
Win1-2Gimhae FC vs Gimpo FC
Win0-1Paju Citizen FC vs Gimpo FC
Win0-1Ansan Greeners FC vs Gimpo FC
Draw1-1Chungbuk Cheongju FC vs Gimpo FC
Lose2-1Seoul E-Land FC vs Gimpo FC
PLAYED
5
WINS
3
GOALS
6:4
GOALS / MATCH
1.2
  • Gimpo FC has won three out of its last five matches with a goal difference of 6:4, scoring 1.2 goals average

Ansan Greeners FC H2H Gimpo FC

Home gameAnsan Greeners FC01Gimpo FCAway gameK League 2
Away gameAnsan Greeners FC11Gimpo FCHome gameK League 2
Away gameAnsan Greeners FC22Gimpo FCHome gameK League 2
Home gameAnsan Greeners FC02Gimpo FCAway gameK League 2
Away gameAnsan Greeners FC01Gimpo FCHome gameK League 2
PLAYED
5
WINS
0
GOALS
3:7
GOALS / MATCH
0.60
  • Ansan Greeners FC lost three times in head-to-head matches
  • Teams played five times head-to-head in the current season with the goals score 3:7; average goals per match – 0.60
BET NOW

FAQ

Football today takes a brief interlude, presenting a perfect moment to hone your betting prowess. Our tipsters have crafted insightful betting tips for the upcoming games. With the added advantage of copy bets, mimic the strategies of successful bettors to enhance your winning potential. Embrace the expertise of our tipsters and transform your next bet into a victory, eagerly awaiting the return of the beautiful game with optimism.

Explore our sportsbook today!