1 : 1
  • 30 May 2026, FK Vidar vs SK Traeff, 1-1, Draw
  • 23 May 2026, FK Eik Tonsberg vs FK Vidar, 3-1, Lose
  • 14 May 2026, FK Vidar vs Sotra SK, 1-3, Lose
  • 10 May 2026, Mjondalen IF vs FK Vidar, 2-0, Lose
  • 03 May 2026, FK Vidar vs Notodden FK, 0-5, Lose
FK Vidar
Home
  • 30 May 2026, FK Vidar vs SK Traeff, 1-1, Draw
  • 24 May 2026, SK Traeff vs Pors Grenland, 3-3, Draw
  • 14 May 2026, SK Traeff vs Lysekloster IL, 4-0, Win
  • 10 May 2026, Sandviken IL vs SK Traeff, 4-2, Lose
  • 03 May 2026, SK Traeff vs Mjondalen IF, 2-2, Draw
SK Traeff
Away
2nd Division
2nd Division, Norway

FK Vidar and SK Traeff drew 1-1 in the 2nd Division clash. Vidar struck early at 8:37 to lead 1-0, with Traeff leveling at 67:30, while Traeff registered more corner chances (7) than Vidar (4).

Traeff committed 19 fouls to Vidar's 10 and collected five yellow cards versus Vidar's single. The higher foul count and reduced discipline from Traeff suggest a more aggressive approach that sought to disrupt Vidar's rhythm and earn set-piece opportunities.

Offside counts were 4 for Traeff and 3 for Vidar, indicating Traeff pursued more forward runs and testing Vidar's defensive line. There is no red card in either camp, implying the match remained within typical refereeing thresholds despite the intensity.

Set-piece pressure played a clear role, with Traeff’s seven corners providing more testing chances for Vidar's defense than Vidar's four corners did for Traeff. The early Vidar goal suggests a compact, low-block setup that allowed a quick break; Traeff's later equalizer shows sustained pressure and successful creation of chances from open play and set pieces.

From a tactical perspective, Vidar benefited from establishing an early lead and potentially sitting deeper to protect it, while Traeff's approach leaned on earning fouls and converting corners to keep the scoreboard open. Defensively, Vidar likely prioritised a compact shape with limited disciplinary risk, whereas Traeff leaned into a higher-risk, high-press style that produced more set-piece opportunities but also more bookings.

For bettors, the key takeaway is that set-piece volume favored Traeff, yet goal conversion remained limited; expect future matches to hinge on discipline and how well Traeff converts corners into clear chances. Monitoring yellow-card risk is important for Traeff in subsequent games, as the accumulation pattern could influence selection and suspension risk.

BET NOW

Form Guide

Draw1-1FK Vidar vs SK Traeff
Lose3-1FK Eik Tonsberg vs FK Vidar
Lose1-3FK Vidar vs Sotra SK
Lose2-0Mjondalen IF vs FK Vidar
Lose0-5FK Vidar vs Notodden FK
PLAYED
5
WINS
0
GOALS
3:14
GOALS / MATCH
0.6
  • FK Vidar has lost four matches in a row with a goal difference of 3:14, scoring 0.6 goals average
Draw1-1FK Vidar vs SK Traeff
Draw3-3SK Traeff vs Pors Grenland
Win4-0SK Traeff vs Lysekloster IL
Lose4-2Sandviken IL vs SK Traeff
Draw2-2SK Traeff vs Mjondalen IF
PLAYED
5
WINS
1
GOALS
12:10
GOALS / MATCH
2.4
  • SK Traeff has won only one out of its last five matches with a goal difference of 12:10, scoring 2.4 goals average

FK Vidar H2H SK Traeff

Home gameFK Vidar11SK TraeffAway game2nd Division
PLAYED
1
WINS
0
GOALS
1:1
GOALS / MATCH
1.00
  • In the last one matches that these two sides meet, FK Vidar overtook SK Traeff
  • FK Vidar won and had one draw
  • FK Vidar and SK Traeff played once with one in the raw
  • Teams played one times head-to-head in the current season with the goals score 1:1; average goals per match – 1.00
BET NOW

FAQ

Football today takes a brief interlude, presenting a perfect moment to hone your betting prowess. Our tipsters have crafted insightful betting tips for the upcoming games. With the added advantage of copy bets, mimic the strategies of successful bettors to enhance your winning potential. Embrace the expertise of our tipsters and transform your next bet into a victory, eagerly awaiting the return of the beautiful game with optimism.

Explore our sportsbook today!