An Official Partner of AFC Bournemouth
1 : 1
  • 05 July 2026, Ittihad Tanger vs CODM Meknes, 2-1, Win
  • 02 July 2026, UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger, 1-0, Lose
  • 28 June 2026, Ittihad Tanger vs Raja CA Casablanca, 1-1, Draw
  • 25 June 2026, Olympique Dcheira vs Ittihad Tanger, 2-0, Lose
  • 21 June 2026, Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra, 1-0, Win
Ittihad Tanger
Home
  • 21 July 2026, UTS Rabat vs JS El Massira, 3-0, Win
  • 17 July 2026, JS El Massira vs UTS Rabat, 1-1, Draw
  • 05 July 2026, Wydad AC Casablanca vs UTS Rabat, 1-2, Win
  • 02 July 2026, UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger, 1-0, Win
  • 28 June 2026, FAR Rabat vs UTS Rabat, 2-2, Draw
UTS Rabat
Away
Botola 1
Botola 1, Morocco

Ittihad Tanger and UTS Rabat shared the spoils in a 1-1 draw that reflected a tight, balanced contest throughout. Tanger took the initiative with an early strike at 23:04 of the first half, and Rabat responded with a second-half equaliser at 01:01:58, signalling a moment of resilience rather than a collapse.

The foul battle skewed slightly in Rabat’s favour, who committed 15 fouls to Tanger’s 12, and earned four yellows versus Tanger’s three. This suggests Rabat applied more aggressive midfield pressing or attempted higher-intensity challenges, which can disrupt rhythm but also risk discipline if not controlled.

Ittihad Tanger registered two offsides compared with Rabat’s one, implying Tanger pursued forward runs with a touch more timing risk in the final third. With no data on shots on target or goalkeeper saves, finishing efficiency cannot be quantified, though the two goals indicate both teams found opportunities to exploit gaps in the other’s defence.

Defensively, the match remained stable enough to avoid any red cards for either side, indicating a controlled approach at both ends of the pitch. The absence of expulsions supports the view of a meticulously managed battle in midfield and at the back, where neither side could leverage numerical superiority.

Set-piece influence appears limited, as both teams produced two corners apiece without a decisive outcome from dead-ball situations. The offside spread hints Tanger probed slightly higher up the pitch, while Rabat’s runs were generally timely but did not culminate in measurable set-piece advantage.

The second-half equaliser illustrates Rabat’s ability to adjust and find a breakthrough against Tanger’s initial lead, underscoring tactical resilience and effective in-game management. Substitution data is not present in the dataset, so the precise impact of changes cannot be assessed, though the timing of Rabat’s response points to a considered second-half plan.

From a betting perspective, the draw outcome aligns with a closely contested match where both teams maintained parity in corners and a disciplined defensive frame. The higher card count on Rabat suggests potential risk factors in future fixtures if they persist with an aggressive approach, while Tanger’s lower card tally hints at steadier discipline under pressure.

BET NOW

Form Guide

Win2-1Ittihad Tanger vs CODM Meknes
Lose1-0UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger
Draw1-1Ittihad Tanger vs Raja CA Casablanca
Lose2-0Olympique Dcheira vs Ittihad Tanger
Win1-0Ittihad Tanger vs CR Khemis Zemamra
PLAYED
5
WINS
2
GOALS
4:5
GOALS / MATCH
0.8
  • Ittihad Tanger has two wins in its last five matches with a goal difference of 4:5, scoring 0.8 goals average
Win3-0UTS Rabat vs JS El Massira
Draw1-1JS El Massira vs UTS Rabat
Win1-2Wydad AC Casablanca vs UTS Rabat
Win1-0UTS Rabat vs Ittihad Tanger
Draw2-2FAR Rabat vs UTS Rabat
PLAYED
5
WINS
3
GOALS
9:4
GOALS / MATCH
1.8
  • UTS Rabat has won three out of its last five matches with a goal difference of 9:4, scoring 1.8 goals average

Ittihad Tanger H2H UTS Rabat

Away gameIttihad Tanger01UTS RabatHome gameBotola 1
Home gameIttihad Tanger11UTS RabatAway gameBotola 1
Home gameIttihad Tanger01UTS RabatAway gameBotola 1
Away gameIttihad Tanger13UTS RabatHome gameBotola 1
Home gameIttihad Tanger21UTS RabatAway gameBotola 1
PLAYED
5
WINS
1
GOALS
4:7
GOALS / MATCH
0.80
  • Ittihad Tanger lost three times in head-to-head matches
  • Teams played five times head-to-head in the current season with the goals score 4:7; average goals per match – 0.80
BET NOW

FAQ

Football today takes a brief interlude, presenting a perfect moment to hone your betting prowess. Our tipsters have crafted insightful betting tips for the upcoming games. With the added advantage of copy bets, mimic the strategies of successful bettors to enhance your winning potential. Embrace the expertise of our tipsters and transform your next bet into a victory, eagerly awaiting the return of the beautiful game with optimism.

Explore our sportsbook today!