An Official Partner of AFC Bournemouth
6 : 0
  • 05 September 2026, UMF Tindastoll (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom), 0-11, Win
  • 28 August 2026, Haukar Hafnarfjordur (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom), 3-5, Win
  • 22 August 2026, KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs Fjardabyggd/Hottur/Leiknir (Wom), 0-2, Lose
  • 18 August 2026, Keflavik (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom), 1-5, Win
  • 14 August 2026, HK Kopavogur (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom), 3-1, Lose
KR Reykjavik (Wom)
Home
  • 05 September 2026, UMF Tindastoll (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom), 0-11, Lose
  • 29 August 2026, Fjardabyggd/Hottur/Leiknir (Wom) vs UMF Tindastoll (Wom), 8-1, Lose
  • 22 August 2026, UMF Tindastoll (Wom) vs HK Kopavogur (Wom), 0-8, Lose
  • 18 August 2026, UMF Tindastoll (Wom) vs Haukar Hafnarfjordur (Wom), 0-3, Lose
  • 15 August 2026, IF Grotta (Wom) vs UMF Tindastoll (Wom), 10-0, Lose
UMF Tindastoll (Wom)
Away
1. Deild - Women
1. Deild - Women, Iceland

KR Reykjavik Women swept UMF Tindastoll Women 6-0, delivering a dominant display in the Deild - Women. Five goals came before halftime, with a final strike after the break to cap the scoreline. The result underlines a one-sided contest from the outset.

KR generated sustained attacking pressure, evidenced by 14 corner kicks to 3 for the visitors. The high corner count signals repeated chances from wide areas and frequent set-piece situations for KR. Tindastoll offered limited resistance during phases of build-up and kept the ball in their own half for long spells.

Defensively, KR kept a clean sheet and absorbed minimal sustained pressure from Tindastoll. The visitors created few meaningful attacking sequences, leaving the home backline relatively untested. KR’s organisation allowed rapid transitions after turnovers to maintain the attacking tempo.

Fouls tell a story of KR’s physical, high-intensity pressing, with 15 committed to Tindastoll’s 3. The direction of play suggests KR hunted second-ball situations and disrupted transitions aggressively. The match finished with one KR yellow card and none for Tindastoll, indicating controlled aggression rather than disciplinary risk.

Offside counts also point to a proactive attacking approach, with KR on 4 offsides to Tindastoll’s 1. This implies frequent forward runs and an aggressive line to catch the defense off guard. The combination of high offside numbers and 14 corners indicates persistent attacking intent throughout the tie.

Set-piece advantage was a clear differentiator, as KR converted from a large set-piece volume while the away side failed to match. The corner dominance likely created the bulk of the goal opportunities and kept Tindastoll under constant threat. Tindastoll’s three corners reflect a relatively limited threat from dead-ball situations.

Tactical discipline and teamwork were evident in KR’s compact defensive structure and rapid attacking transitions. The home side’s unit pressed, won possession high, and exploited the flanks with coordinated runs. Tindastoll struggled to sustain defensive shape or mount a coherent counter-pressure.

For bettors, the data signals a high-probability scenario for dominant home teams delivering wide-attacking play and multiple corners. A clean sheet for KR aligns with the defensive performance observed and the away side’s limited aggression. In similar setups, markets around corners and goals can present attractive value where a home side exerts sustained pressure.

BET NOW

Form Guide

Win0-11UMF Tindastoll (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom)
Win3-5Haukar Hafnarfjordur (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom)
Lose0-2KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs Fjardabyggd/Hottur/Leiknir (Wom)
Win1-5Keflavik (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom)
Lose3-1HK Kopavogur (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom)
PLAYED
5
WINS
3
GOALS
22:9
GOALS / MATCH
4.4
  • KR Reykjavik (Wom) has won three out of its last five matches with a goal difference of 22:9, scoring 4.4 goals average
Lose0-11UMF Tindastoll (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom)
Lose8-1Fjardabyggd/Hottur/Leiknir (Wom) vs UMF Tindastoll (Wom)
Lose0-8UMF Tindastoll (Wom) vs HK Kopavogur (Wom)
Lose0-3UMF Tindastoll (Wom) vs Haukar Hafnarfjordur (Wom)
Lose10-0IF Grotta (Wom) vs UMF Tindastoll (Wom)
PLAYED
5
WINS
0
GOALS
1:40
GOALS / MATCH
0.2
  • UMF Tindastoll (Wom) has lost five matches in a row with a goal difference of 1:40, scoring 0.2 goals average

KR Reykjavik (Wom) H2H UMF Tindastoll (Wom)

Away gameKR Reykjavik (Wom)110UMF Tindastoll (Wom)Home game1. Deild - Women
Home gameKR Reykjavik (Wom)60UMF Tindastoll (Wom)Away game1. Deild - Women
Away gameKR Reykjavik (Wom)11UMF Tindastoll (Wom)Home gameIcelandic League Cup A - Women
Home gameKR Reykjavik (Wom)41UMF Tindastoll (Wom)Away gameIcelandic Cup - Women
Home gameKR Reykjavik (Wom)10UMF Tindastoll (Wom)Away gameIcelandic Cup - Women
PLAYED
5
WINS
4
GOALS
23:2
GOALS / MATCH
4.60
  • In the last five matches that these two sides meet, KR Reykjavik (Wom) overtook UMF Tindastoll (Wom) four times
  • KR Reykjavik (Wom) won four times and had one draw
  • Teams played five times head-to-head in the current season with the goals score 23:2; average goals per match – 4.60
BET NOW

FAQ

Football today takes a brief interlude, presenting a perfect moment to hone your betting prowess. Our tipsters have crafted insightful betting tips for the upcoming games. With the added advantage of copy bets, mimic the strategies of successful bettors to enhance your winning potential. Embrace the expertise of our tipsters and transform your next bet into a victory, eagerly awaiting the return of the beautiful game with optimism.

Explore our sportsbook today!