- 12 September 2026, KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs Keflavik (Wom), 1-0, Win
- 05 September 2026, UMF Tindastoll (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom), 0-11, Win
- 28 August 2026, Haukar Hafnarfjordur (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom), 3-5, Win
- 22 August 2026, KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs Fjardabyggd/Hottur/Leiknir (Wom), 0-2, Lose
- 18 August 2026, Keflavik (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom), 1-5, Win
- 05 September 2026, Volsungur (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom), 1-3, Win
- 29 August 2026, IF Grotta (Wom) vs UMF Selfoss (Wom), 3-0, Win
- 21 August 2026, Keflavik (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom), 0-1, Win
- 15 August 2026, IF Grotta (Wom) vs UMF Tindastoll (Wom), 10-0, Win
- 06 August 2026, KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom), 0-0, Draw
The match finished 0-0, a tight defensive duel between KR Reykjavik Women and Grotta Women. KR pressed with more width, earning 9 corner kicks to Grotta’s 6, while Grotta avoided offside opportunities and stayed compact in defense. No goals or red cards changed hands, but the foul balance shows KR were the more aggressive side in pursuit of a breakthrough.
KR committed 11 fouls to Grotta’s 7, indicating a higher pressing intensity and more ball recovery challenges for Grotta. Grotta collected two yellow cards—one in the first half at 00:40:21 and another in the second half at 01:31:35—while KR’s caution came later, at 01:13:47 in the second period. The discipline pattern suggests Grotta maintained composure while absorbing pressure in spells.
KR’s nine corners point to persistent wide attacks and repeated set-piece entries, even though none yielded a winner. Grotta’s six corners show they were able to respond with attacking opportunities down the flanks as well. The combination of high corner activity and KR’s frequent offside runs (nine) indicates a relentless forward tempo from KR but with timing that exposed the offside line.
Grotta’s zero offsides implies their defense and forwards held a precise line, contributing to the clean sheet. KR’s nine offsides reveal a tactical gamble of making late runs behind Grotta’s backline, which increased the risk of mis-timed movements. The balance of set-piece pressure and off-the-ball movement shaped a match where small margins determined the lack of an opening goal.
For bettors, the encounter demonstrates the value of defensively structured matches that still produce repeated set-piece activity. The higher corner count for KR suggests a persistent attacking projection from wide areas, even without conversion. In future fixtures with this profile, monitoring teams’ willingness to risk offside lines and count on set-piece opportunities could offer actionable insights.
Form Guide
| Win | 1-0 | KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs Keflavik (Wom) | |
| Win | 0-11 | UMF Tindastoll (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom) | |
| Win | 3-5 | Haukar Hafnarfjordur (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom) | |
| Lose | 0-2 | KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs Fjardabyggd/Hottur/Leiknir (Wom) | |
| Win | 1-5 | Keflavik (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom) |
- PLAYED
- 5
- WINS
- 4
- GOALS
- 22:6
- GOALS / MATCH
- 4.4
- KR Reykjavik (Wom) has four wins in its last five matches with a goal difference of 22:6, scoring 4.4 goals average
| Win | 1-3 | Volsungur (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom) | |
| Win | 3-0 | IF Grotta (Wom) vs UMF Selfoss (Wom) | |
| Win | 0-1 | Keflavik (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom) | |
| Win | 10-0 | IF Grotta (Wom) vs UMF Tindastoll (Wom) | |
| Draw | 0-0 | KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom) |
- PLAYED
- 5
- WINS
- 4
- GOALS
- 17:1
- GOALS / MATCH
- 3.4
- IF Grotta (Wom) has four wins in its last five matches with a goal difference of 17:1, scoring 3.4 goals average
KR Reykjavik (Wom) H2H IF Grotta (Wom)
| Home game | KR Reykjavik (Wom) | 0 | 0 | IF Grotta (Wom) | Away game | 1. Deild - Women | |
| Away game | KR Reykjavik (Wom) | 0 | 2 | IF Grotta (Wom) | Home game | 1. Deild - Women | |
| Away game | KR Reykjavik (Wom) | 0 | 2 | IF Grotta (Wom) | Home game | 1. Deild - Women | |
| Home game | KR Reykjavik (Wom) | 2 | 4 | IF Grotta (Wom) | Away game | 1. Deild - Women | |
| Home game | KR Reykjavik (Wom) | 1 | 4 | IF Grotta (Wom) | Away game | 1. Deild - Women |
- PLAYED
- 5
- WINS
- 0
- GOALS
- 3:12
- GOALS / MATCH
- 0.60
- KR Reykjavik (Wom) lost four times in head-to-head matches
- Teams played five times head-to-head in the current season with the goals score 3:12; average goals per match – 0.60
FAQ
Are any of the tips provided here guaranteed?
What are the eligibility requirements to sign up and bet online with CopyBet™?
Football today takes a brief interlude, presenting a perfect moment to hone your betting prowess. Our tipsters have crafted insightful betting tips for the upcoming games. With the added advantage of copy bets, mimic the strategies of successful bettors to enhance your winning potential. Embrace the expertise of our tipsters and transform your next bet into a victory, eagerly awaiting the return of the beautiful game with optimism.
Explore our sportsbook today!