- 05 September 2026, Volsungur (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom), 1-3, Win
- 29 August 2026, IF Grotta (Wom) vs UMF Selfoss (Wom), 3-0, Win
- 21 August 2026, Keflavik (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom), 0-1, Win
- 15 August 2026, IF Grotta (Wom) vs UMF Tindastoll (Wom), 10-0, Win
- 06 August 2026, KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom), 0-0, Draw
- 06 September 2026, Keflavik (Wom) vs Fjardabyggd/Hottur/Leiknir (Wom), 3-1, Win
- 27 August 2026, HK Kopavogur (Wom) vs Keflavik (Wom), 1-1, Draw
- 21 August 2026, Keflavik (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom), 0-1, Lose
- 18 August 2026, Keflavik (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom), 1-5, Lose
- 14 August 2026, IA Akranes (Wom) vs Keflavik (Wom), 2-1, Lose
Grotta (home) edged Keflavík (away) 4-3 in a match that swung from a narrow start to a vivid late surge. The opener came early for Grotta, but Keflavík flipped the half with two quick strikes to lead 2-1 at the break. After the restart, Grotta seized control, leveling at 46:20 and then pulling clear with strikes at 56:30 and 79:57 before Keflavík’s late 86:41 reply.
From an attacking standpoint, Grotta showed intent by converting opportunities as the game opened up in the second half, scoring four goals overall. Keflavík pressed with purpose to take the lead before the interval, but Grotta’s finishing after the restart changed the momentum decisively. The numbers indicate Keflavík pursued a more forward shape, as suggested by their five offsides, which points to aggressive movement and passes in advanced areas.
Defensively, Keflavík’s 10 fouls reflect a more aggressive approach in trying to disrupt Grotta’s rhythm, while Grotta committed only four fouls and received no bookings. The clean discipline from Grotta helped them maintain shape as Keflavík pushed to close the gap. Grotta’s ability to withstand that pressure and still add two more goals in the second period was a key factor in the result.
Set-piece and territorial pressure can be inferred from the data: Grotta earned four corners to Keflavík’s two, indicating more frequent attacking deliveries and pressure in wide areas. Although no direct set-piece goals are recorded, the higher corner count correlates with a more intense second-half siege that produced the tying and winning strikes. This suggests Grotta exploited dead-ball moments as part of their attacking plan.
Tactically, Keflavík’s early two-goal burst suggests a game plan built on compact transitions and quick counters, but Grotta’s response after fall-behind shows a capable adjustment to tempo and space. The late sequence—two goals in quick succession—highlights Grotta’s capacity to shift gears, sustain pressure, and finish efficiently in the final third. Overall, Grotta’s cleaner discipline, combined with higher corner activity, was crucial in turning a 1-2 deficit into a 4-3 win.
For bettors, the result underscores Grotta’s potential in home clashes where they can surge after conceding, especially when corners and volume of play increase in the second half. Keflavík’s higher foul count and more offsides suggest riskier forward play that can backfire if the opponent counters effectively. The match outcome also highlights the value of considering second-half aggression and set-piece pressure when evaluating similar fixtures.
Form Guide
| Win | 1-3 | Volsungur (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom) | |
| Win | 3-0 | IF Grotta (Wom) vs UMF Selfoss (Wom) | |
| Win | 0-1 | Keflavik (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom) | |
| Win | 10-0 | IF Grotta (Wom) vs UMF Tindastoll (Wom) | |
| Draw | 0-0 | KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom) |
- PLAYED
- 5
- WINS
- 4
- GOALS
- 17:1
- GOALS / MATCH
- 3.4
- IF Grotta (Wom) has four wins in its last five matches with a goal difference of 17:1, scoring 3.4 goals average
| Win | 3-1 | Keflavik (Wom) vs Fjardabyggd/Hottur/Leiknir (Wom) | |
| Draw | 1-1 | HK Kopavogur (Wom) vs Keflavik (Wom) | |
| Lose | 0-1 | Keflavik (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom) | |
| Lose | 1-5 | Keflavik (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom) | |
| Lose | 2-1 | IA Akranes (Wom) vs Keflavik (Wom) |
- PLAYED
- 5
- WINS
- 1
- GOALS
- 6:10
- GOALS / MATCH
- 1.2
- Keflavik (Wom) has won only one out of its last five matches with a goal difference of 6:10, scoring 1.2 goals average
IF Grotta (Wom) H2H Keflavik (Wom)
| Away game | IF Grotta (Wom) | 1 | 0 | Keflavik (Wom) | Home game | 1. Deild - Women | |
| Home game | IF Grotta (Wom) | 4 | 3 | Keflavik (Wom) | Away game | 1. Deild - Women | |
| Home game | IF Grotta (Wom) | 3 | 0 | Keflavik (Wom) | Away game | 1. Deild - Women | |
| Away game | IF Grotta (Wom) | 2 | 1 | Keflavik (Wom) | Home game | 1. Deild - Women | |
| Home game | IF Grotta (Wom) | 1 | 3 | Keflavik (Wom) | Away game | Icelandic Cup - Women |
- PLAYED
- 5
- WINS
- 4
- GOALS
- 11:7
- GOALS / MATCH
- 2.20
- In the last five matches that these two sides meet, IF Grotta (Wom) overtook Keflavik (Wom) four times
- IF Grotta (Wom) won four times, lost once
- Teams played five times head-to-head in the current season with the goals score 11:7; average goals per match – 2.20
FAQ
Are any of the tips provided here guaranteed?
What are the eligibility requirements to sign up and bet online with CopyBet™?
Football today takes a brief interlude, presenting a perfect moment to hone your betting prowess. Our tipsters have crafted insightful betting tips for the upcoming games. With the added advantage of copy bets, mimic the strategies of successful bettors to enhance your winning potential. Embrace the expertise of our tipsters and transform your next bet into a victory, eagerly awaiting the return of the beautiful game with optimism.
Explore our sportsbook today!