- 30 May 2026, UMF Tindastoll (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom), 0-5, Win
- 25 May 2026, IF Grotta (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom), 2-0, Win
- 19 May 2026, Fjardabyggd/Hottur/Leiknir (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom), 0-2, Win
- 10 May 2026, IF Grotta (Wom) vs HK Kopavogur (Wom), 3-2, Win
- 02 May 2026, IF Grotta (Wom) vs Haukar Hafnarfjordur (Wom), 4-5, Lose
- 30 May 2026, KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs HK Kopavogur (Wom), 6-0, Win
- 25 May 2026, IF Grotta (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom), 2-0, Lose
- 20 May 2026, KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs IA Akranes (Wom), 3-2, Win
- 10 May 2026, Volsungur (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom), 0-1, Win
- 03 May 2026, KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs UMF Selfoss (Wom), 4-3, Win
IF Grotta (Wom) secured a 2-0 victory against KR Reykjavik (Wom) at home, with the opener coming at 00:29:28 and the second score arriving early in the second half at 01:24:01. The timing shows Grotta establishing control in the first half and sealing the result soon after the restart. This pattern indicates effective game management across both periods.
Defensive discipline and foul balance are notable: Grotta finished with zero yellow cards, while KR picked up one. KR also committed more fouls (12) than Grotta (9), yet both sides delivered four corners and two offsides, suggesting similar levels of attacking activity but differing in efficiency and discipline. No red cards influenced the match, preserving stability for Grotta’s back line.
Attacking and finishing: Grotta converted two clear chances, scoring the first in 29 minutes and adding a second shortly after the break. KR created pressure but could not convert sufficient opportunities to trouble the Grotta defense, leaving the home side with a clean sheet to reward their structured performance. The data point to Grotta’s effectiveness when opportunities arose.
Set-piece and structure: With identical corner counts, there was no evident set-piece advantage for either team. KR’s higher foul tally did not translate into a direct attacking payoff, suggesting Grotta’s defensive shape and discipline neutralised their approach and limited counter-threats.
For bettors, the takeaway is that Grotta’s blend of organized defense and efficient finishing underpinned the win, reinforcing their appeal in similar home environments. KR’s higher fouling rate without a corresponding scoring return signals caution for backing them on the road, where discipline and finishing efficiency will determine outcomes against compact defenses like Grotta.
Form Guide
| Win | 0-5 | UMF Tindastoll (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom) | |
| Win | 2-0 | IF Grotta (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom) | |
| Win | 0-2 | Fjardabyggd/Hottur/Leiknir (Wom) vs IF Grotta (Wom) | |
| Win | 3-2 | IF Grotta (Wom) vs HK Kopavogur (Wom) | |
| Lose | 4-5 | IF Grotta (Wom) vs Haukar Hafnarfjordur (Wom) |
- PLAYED
- 5
- WINS
- 4
- GOALS
- 16:7
- GOALS / MATCH
- 3.2
- IF Grotta (Wom) has four wins in its last five matches with a goal difference of 16:7, scoring 3.2 goals average
| Win | 6-0 | KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs HK Kopavogur (Wom) | |
| Lose | 2-0 | IF Grotta (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom) | |
| Win | 3-2 | KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs IA Akranes (Wom) | |
| Win | 0-1 | Volsungur (Wom) vs KR Reykjavik (Wom) | |
| Win | 4-3 | KR Reykjavik (Wom) vs UMF Selfoss (Wom) |
- PLAYED
- 5
- WINS
- 4
- GOALS
- 14:7
- GOALS / MATCH
- 2.8
- KR Reykjavik (Wom) has four wins in its last five matches with a goal difference of 14:7, scoring 2.8 goals average
IF Grotta (Wom) H2H KR Reykjavik (Wom)
| Home game | IF Grotta (Wom) | 2 | 0 | KR Reykjavik (Wom) | Away game | 1. Deild - Women | |
| Home game | IF Grotta (Wom) | 2 | 0 | KR Reykjavik (Wom) | Away game | 1. Deild - Women | |
| Away game | IF Grotta (Wom) | 4 | 2 | KR Reykjavik (Wom) | Home game | 1. Deild - Women | |
| Away game | IF Grotta (Wom) | 4 | 1 | KR Reykjavik (Wom) | Home game | 1. Deild - Women | |
| Home game | IF Grotta (Wom) | 5 | 0 | KR Reykjavik (Wom) | Away game | 1. Deild - Women |
- PLAYED
- 5
- WINS
- 5
- GOALS
- 17:3
- GOALS / MATCH
- 3.40
- In the last five matches that these two sides meet, IF Grotta (Wom) overtook KR Reykjavik (Wom) five times
- IF Grotta (Wom) won five times
- Teams played five times head-to-head in the current season with the goals score 17:3; average goals per match – 3.40
FAQ
Are any of the tips provided here guaranteed?
What are the eligibility requirements to sign up and bet online with CopyBet™?
Football today takes a brief interlude, presenting a perfect moment to hone your betting prowess. Our tipsters have crafted insightful betting tips for the upcoming games. With the added advantage of copy bets, mimic the strategies of successful bettors to enhance your winning potential. Embrace the expertise of our tipsters and transform your next bet into a victory, eagerly awaiting the return of the beautiful game with optimism.
Explore our sportsbook today!